Namisa Blogger of the year 2013,Stimulating the much needed debate

     just an overview on the forthcoming meeting of parliament   as one of the journalist who  has been following parliamentary meetings  seven years now.

Parliament is here again,Malawians tax payers are yet to be wasted again.

Can it be possible that the speaker’s hot seat be taken by someone?anything is possible with the DPP government.

Number of Meetings in a session.

Although the constitution does not restrict the maximum number of meetings the House can have in a session, the practice over the years have revealed that the 42nd session has become the longest in the history of the Malawi Parliament with 6 meetings.  Section 59 (2), (3) and (4) provide for the minimum number of meetings per session (2) and that the duration of any session shall be determined by the President in consultation with the Speaker.


In established parliaments that follow the Westminster model like Malawi, a session is usually a year long and that at the beginning of the session the Head of state opens parliament outlining what his Government’s agenda will be like in the next 12 months and what has been achieved in the past 12 months. What is happening now is like the government has no specific targets/agenda to be met in a session hence the continuation of the 42nd session up to now. Worse still it has never happened that a session has two Budget meetings of Parliament: 2010/2011 and 2011/2012.

Why do the president and the speaker insist on the 42nd session?

Repealing of the Injunction Bill.

One of the issues that were raised in the 20th July petition was the repealing of the Injunctions Act. It is expected that the 6th Meeting of the 42nd session will repeal this Act or so that is the impression that has come from government quarters.


The truth of the matter is that this is going to be difficult, or put bluntly the Injunctions Act will not be repealed if we consider the current legal framework.

The National Assembly standing Orders do not allow discussions of an issue that is before a court of law, the sub-judice rule.  An injunction was granted against assenting to the bill. The Government is challenging that injunction. What this means is that the issue of the Injunctions Act is still in a court of law and most likely the courts may not make a determination on the injunction and indeed the judicial review before the House meets on the 14th November. Effectively it means the House cannot proceed to debate any proposed bill to repeal the Injunctions Bill.

Committee Reports.

During the last meeting and indeed in previous other meetings of Parliament numerous Committee reports have been discussed and adopted in the House.


The question is what then follows. Have there been any responses from Ministries and departments on issues raised in the committee reports as required by the rules of the House? Ever since the committees started presenting reports in the House, there has never been any response presented by any Ministry or government department in the House and the House itself has not followed up. Yet each committee meeting costs the taxpayer about 10 million kwacha discussing issues that nobody seems interested to neither respond to nor follow up. And there are 14 Committees which means K140 million spent per quarter translating to over a half a billion kwacha per annum.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: